PROJECT HELP 
SSKA members are some of the most prominent and respected suppliers in the self-service and kiosk industry.

Request project help from SSKA members
Follow SSKA on...



 Blog: SSKA News 
SSKA Industry News
Tuesday, 25 November 2008
A battle is brewing between the studios that develop motion pictures and the operators of DVD rental kiosks that dispense them.
 
For redbox, the first mortar shell landed on the afternoon of August 26.
 
That's when, according to litigation filed by the DVD kiosk operator, representatives of Universal Studios Home Entertainment showed up unexpectedly at redbox headquarters in Oakbrook Terrace, Ill., with an ultimatum: Sign a revenue sharing agreement or lose the right to buy Universal DVDs from their commercial distributors.
 
An operator of roughly 10,000 DVD rental kiosks at a variety of retail and fast food locations, redbox has gained notoriety in recent years for its ability to offer DVD rentals for $1 a day.
 
Representatives of redbox won't comment on the tenor of the meeting, but court documents reveal that redbox "had no prior notice as to the nature of this proposal, which would materially and adversely alter the conditions under which consumers are able to rent and buy DVDs from kiosk outlets."
 
Universal's proposed agreement would effectively control the types of DVDs that could be stocked in redbox kiosks, as well as the price redbox could charge for them. Specifically, the agreement would:
  • Prohibit redbox from stocking its kiosks with Universal's new releases until 45 days after the "street date" when they hit the market.
  • Limit the number of Universal DVDs of a particular motion picture that can be offered at the kiosk, based on that motion picture’s Box Office revenues.
  • Ban redbox from selling previously-viewed Universal DVDs at a discount, requiring the company to destroy any DVDs no longer used for rental.
According to court documents, Universal gave redbox until the end of the next business day to sign the agreement and threatened to bar commercial resellers Ingram Entertainment Inc. and Video Products Distributors Inc. (VPD) · redbox's sole vendors for Universal DVDs · from selling to redbox if the kiosk operator refused, beginning December 1.
 
A representative of Universal Studios was reached by phone, but she declined to comment, citing pending litigation.
 
Gary Lancina, vice president of marketing for redbox, says the chances of redbox signing the agreement are nil.
 
"The fact is, redbox has no intention of signing the revenue sharing agreement," Lancina wrote in an e-mail. "Redbox is committed to providing our customers the same level of service, convenience and value they've come to expect from us."
 
On Oct. 10, redbox filed a lawsuit against Universal at the U.S. District Court in Delaware, seeking an injunction against Universal's actions. The lawsuit accuses Universal of attempting to infringe upon redbox's right to freely use the DVDs it has purchased; violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, which safeguards the right to free trade; and wrongfully interfering with redbox's relationship with Ingram and VPD.
 

Mum's the word
 
Lancina says that, thus far, Universal is the only studio to approach redbox in an attempt to limit its movie offerings. Other motion picture studios have remained silent on the issue. SelfService.org contacted Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc. and Paramount Pictures, but both declined to comment.
 
The Motion Picture Association of America – an advocacy group that represents the interests of the motion picture industry – also was contacted, but an MPAA representative referred all inquiries back to Universal Studios.
 
Lancina says he suspects Universal has approached other DVD kiosk operators in an attempt to persuade them to sign similar agreements, but he would not provide details.

DVDPlay reacts
 
Charlie Piper, president and chief operating officer of DVDPlay Inc., says his company is among those contacted by Universal. Shortly after redbox failed to comply with Universal's terms, Piper says DVDPlay received a call from VPD in which the distributor indicated that it could no longer supply them with Universal DVDs.
 
At that point, Piper says Universal was unwilling to compromise with any of the kiosk operators unless they were willing to sign the agreement.
"We will not sign the revenue sharing agreement. It doesn't work for us. We still plan on having the titles available in our kiosks and we have alternative plans to make sure that we have those available."
                    - Charlie Piper
                      DVDPlay
 
"It was clearly laid out to freeze out the kiosk business," Piper said.
 
Piper says that, like redbox, DVDPlay will not bow to Universal's demands.
 
"We will not. We will not sign the revenue sharing agreement," Piper said. "It doesn't work for us. We still plan on having the titles available in our kiosks and we have alternative plans to make sure that we have those available."
 
Piper says that his company will purchase the Universal DVDs from retailers like Wal-Mart, if necessary. He also said that, although DVDPlay is steering clear of a legal battle right now, his company is willing to take it to the courts if necessary.
 
CLICK BELOW TO LISTEN TO PIPER DISCUSS DVDPLAY'S OPTIONS.
 
"There are movies there that our customers want to see," he said.

Losing ground
 
Some self-service advocates argue that Universal is using strong-arm tactics in an effort to keep its foothold in an industry that's drastically changing with the times. Davis Freeburg, a blogger who regularly covers the digital entertainment industry, says Universal's actions betray a hint of desperation.
 
"Universal is losing on the pricing front," Freeburg said. "They're basically having somebody sell things for $1 that, in the past, they've been able to get away with charging $3 or $5 for. No one is going to pay $10 for a DVD if you can go and just rent the movie from redbox for 99 cents for one night."
 
The relatively cheap prices offered by DVD kiosks, Freeburg says, is causing some potential DVD purchasers to rent instead, which means less revenue for companies like Universal.
 
CLICK BELOW TO HEAR FREEBURG EXPLAIN WHY REDBOX RENTALS ARE SO CHEAP.
 
 
Freeburg says it's unfair for Universal to place limitations on self-service kiosks that don't exist for brick-and-mortar retailers like Blockbuster, arguing that what redbox does with the DVDs it purchases is its business.
 
"It's very clear that, if you buy a DVD, you can do what you want with it," Freeburg said. "You're allowed to go and rent it to other people. You're allowed to sell it to your friends. You can give it to your friends and they can give it to their friends and 100 people could watch it. It's all legal because we have fair-use rights when it comes to DVDs."

The licensing factor
 
But not everyone in the self-service space is lining up to support companies like redbox.
 
Todd Rosenbaum, chief executive of Polar Frog Digital, an operator of DVD burn-on-demand kiosks and a competitor of redbox, says the company doesn't have a leg to stand on. He says, unlike brick-and-mortar retailers, redbox doesn't pay licensing fees to the studios.
 
"Redbox just goes and buys closeouts of products and turns around and rents them and doesn't give the studios revenue share," Rosenbaum said. "That isn't how Netflix works. That isn't how Blockbuster works. They [Redbox] tried to circumvent the system."
 
CLICK BELOW TO HEAR ROSENBAUM DISCUSS LICENSING FEES.
 
 
Redbox was contacted but declined to comment on whether or not it pays licensing fees to Universal.
 
Piper says that, although his company doesn't pay licensing fees, it makes up for this difference by providing advertising on its kiosks for the studios, including movie trailers and posters, though he admits that there is no formal agreement that these services are provided in lieu of licensing fees.
 
Rosenbaum says he thinks Universal will prevail against Redbox's lawsuit and the victory will signal a shift in the way DVD rental kiosks operate.
 
"I think more studios will jump on board with that litigation against them [redbox]," he said. "I think that's a valid concern of theirs."
 
Universal had until Nov. 3 to file court documents responding to the allegations made in the redbox lawsuit. According to the clerk's office at the U.S. District Court in the District of Delaware, that paperwork has not been filed at the time of this writing. Court dates have not yet been scheduled.
 
The deadline by which Universal threatens to cut off commercial sales to redbox is Dec. 1.
 
POSTED BY: Travis K. Kircher AT 01:14 pm   |  Permalink   |  0 Comments  |  E-mail this
Comments:

Post comment:
Name:
 *
Email Address:

Message: (max 750 characters)
*
Verify image below:
*
* Required Fields
Note: All comments are subject to approval. Your comment will not appear until it has been approved.

PROJECT HELP 
SSKA members are some of the most prominent and respected suppliers in the self-service and kiosk industries.

Request project help from SSKA members
 Blog: SSKA Industry News 
Latest Posts
Archive
Categories

Subscribe to this blog's feed

Member Blogs
Testimonials 
Janet Webster, Creative Solutions Consulting
"Being a member of SSKA is extremely beneficial. It's a great organization that helps its members to achieve their goals."

Janet Webster
President
Creative Solutions Consulting


Self-Service & Kiosk Association | 13100 Eastpoint Park Blvd. Louisville, KY 40223 | Phone: (502) 241-7545 | Toll-free: (877) 441-7545 | Fax: (502) 241-2795

Also from NetWorld Alliance:
ATMmarketplace.com | DigitalSignageAssociation.org | DigitalSignageToday.com | FastCasual.com | KioskMarketplace.com
PizzaMarketplace.com | QSRweb.com | RetailCustomerExperience.com | SelfServiceWorld.com